Skip Navigation
National Profile on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards:

NCSER 2009-3014
August 2009

References

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA/APA/NCME). (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Cizek, G.J. (2001). Setting Performance Standards: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ferrara, S., Perie, M., and Johnson, E. (2002). Matching the Judgmental Task With Standard Setting Panelist Expertise: The Item-Descriptor (ID) Matching Procedure. Presented to the National Research Council's Board of Testing and Assessment (BOTA), Washington, DC.

Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.

Livingston, S.A., and Zieky, M.J. (1982). Passing Scores: A Manual for Setting Standards of Performance on Educational and Occupational Tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Perie, M. (2007). Setting Alternate Achievement Standards. Dover, NH: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. Retrieved January 31, 2008 from http://www.nciea.org/publications/CCSSO_MAP07.pdf.

Roeber, E. (2002). Setting Standards on Alternate Assessments (Synthesis Report 42). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved January 31, 2008 from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis42.html.

Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Thompson, S.J., and Thurlow, M.L. (2000). State Alternate Assessments: Status as IDEA Alternate Assessment Requirements Take Effect (Synthesis Report 35). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis35.html.

U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Alternate Achievement Standards for Students With the Most Significant Cognitive Disabilities. Non-Regulatory Guidance. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2004). Standards and Assessments Peer Review Guidance: Information and Examples for Meeting Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Washington, DC: Author.

Top