Table C11. What evidence supported the validity argument in terms of the assessment system's producing intended and/or unintended consequences?

Appendix B: Data Tables

State	1. Survey	2. Public reports	3. Other post hoc data collection/analysis
Total	16	5	9
Percent	72.73	22.73	40.91

Alabama	†	†	†
Alaska	X	—	—
Arizona	X	—	—
Arkansas	†	†	†
California	†	†	†

Colorado	X	—	—
Connecticut	†	†	†
Delaware	X	—	—
District of Columbia	†	†	†
Florida	†	†	†

Georgia	—	—	X
Hawaii	X	—	—
Idaho	X	—	X
Illinois	†	†	†
Indiana	X	—	—

Iowa	X	—	—
Kansas	†	†	†
Kentucky	†	†	†
Louisiana	†	†	†
Maine	†	†	†

Maryland	†	†	†
Massachusetts	—	X	X
Michigan¹	† / †	† / †	† / †
Minnesota	†	†	†
Mississippi	X	—	—

Missouri	†	†	†
Montana	†	†	†
Nebraska	†	†	†
Nevada	X	X	—
New Hampshire	X	—	—

New Jersey	†	†	†
New Mexico	—	—	X
New York	X	—	X
North Carolina	†	†	†
North Dakota	†	†	†

Ohio	†	†	†
Oklahoma	†	†	†
Oregon	—	X	X
Pennsylvania	X	—	—
Rhode Island	X	X	X

South Carolina	†	†	†
South Dakota	—	—	X
Tennessee	†	†	†
Texas	†	†	†
Utah	†	†	†

Vermont	—	X	—
Virginia	†	†	†
Washington	†	†	†
West Virginia	†	†	†
Wisconsin	X	—	X
Wyoming	X	—	—
— No. X Yes. † Not applicable. State did not have alternate achievement standards for this assessment. ¹ More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07.