Table C13. What evidence supported the validity argument in terms of measurement of construct relevance?

Appendix B: Data Tables

State	1. Statistical analyses	2. Construct Analyses
Total	13	25
Percent	43.33	83.33

Alabama	†	†
Alaska	†	†
Arizona	X	—
Arkansas	—	X
California	—	X

Colorado	—	X
Connecticut	—	X
Delaware	†	†
District of Columbia	—	X
Florida	†	†

Georgia	—	X
Hawaii	X	X
Idaho	X	X
Illinois	†	†
Indiana	†	†

Iowa	†	†
Kansas	—	X
Kentucky	X	X
Louisiana	—	X
Maine	—	X

Maryland	—	X
Massachusetts	—	X
Michigan¹	— / X	X / —
Minnesota	—	X
Mississippi	X	—

Missouri	X	—
Montana	†	†
Nebraska	†	†
Nevada	—	X
New Hampshire	—	X

New Jersey	†	†
New Mexico	—	X
New York	†	†
North Carolina	†	†
North Dakota	†	†

Ohio	X	—
Oklahoma	†	†
Oregon	†	†
Pennsylvania	†	†
Rhode Island	X	X

South Carolina	X	X
South Dakota	†	†
Tennessee	†	†
Texas	†	†
Utah	†	†

Vermont	—	X
Virginia	†	†
Washington	—	X
West Virginia	X	X
Wisconsin	X	—
Wyoming	X	X
— No. X Yes. † Not applicable. State did not have alternate achievement standards for this assessment. ¹ More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07.