Table C22. Have conditional standard errors of measurement (CSEMs) been reported for the alternate assessment?
State | 1. Yes (Statistical analysis) | 2. No | 3. Not appropriate for this type of assessment |
---|---|---|---|
Total | 18 | 23 | 9 |
Percent | 35.29 | 45.1 | 17.65 |
Alabama | X | — | — |
Alaska | X | — | — |
Arizona | X | — | — |
Arkansas | — | — | X |
California | X | — | — |
Colorado | — | X | — |
Connecticut | — | — | X |
Delaware | — | X | — |
District of Columbia | X | — | — |
Florida | † | † | † |
Georgia | — | — | X |
Hawaii | — | X | — |
Idaho | X | — | — |
Illinois | — | X | — |
Indiana | — | X | — |
Iowa | — | X | — |
Kansas | — | X | — |
Kentucky | — | X | — |
Louisiana | — | X | — |
Maine | — | — | X |
Maryland | — | X | — |
Massachusetts | — | — | X |
Michigan1 | X / X | — / — | — / — |
Minnesota | X | — | — |
Mississippi | X | — | — |
Missouri | X | — | — |
Montana | — | X | — |
Nebraska | — | — | X |
Nevada | — | X | — |
New Hampshire | — | — | X |
New Jersey | — | X | — |
New Mexico | X | — | — |
New York | — | — | X |
North Carolina | — | X | — |
North Dakota | X | — | — |
Ohio | X | — | — |
Oklahoma | — | X | — |
Oregon | — | X | — |
Pennsylvania | — | X | — |
Rhode Island | — | X | — |
South Carolina | X | — | — |
South Dakota | X | — | — |
Tennessee | — | X | — |
Texas | — | X | — |
Utah | — | X | — |
Vermont | — | — | X |
Virginia | — | X | — |
Washington | — | X | — |
West Virginia | X | — | — |
Wisconsin | X | — | — |
Wyoming | X | — | — |
— No. X Yes. † Not applicable. State did not have alternate achievement standards for this assessment. 1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07. |