Skip Navigation
IES    
NCSER
National Center for
Special Education
Research
Menu
Contact
Search Grants
ED.gov
Newsflash
Search NCSER
National Profile on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards:

NCSER 2009-3014
August 2009

Back Arrow  Appendix B: Data Tables

Table C4.  Who was involved in reviewing fairness in the development of the alternate assessment?


State1. State
special
education
staff		2. State
assessment
staff		3. State
instruction
and curriculum
staff		4. Test vendor5. Outside experts6. Special
education
teachers		7. General
education
teachers		8. Content
specialists		9. School
psychologists/
counselors		10. School/
district/
state
administrators		11. Parents12. Other13. State
did not
address
fairness
Total36422627344433336173353
Percent70.5982.3550.9852.9466.6786.2764.7164.7111.7633.3364.719.85.88
              
AlabamaXX—XX————————
AlaskaXXXXXXXX——X——
ArizonaXX——XX——XX———
Arkansas—XX——XXX———X—
CaliforniaXX—XXXXX—X———
              
ColoradoX——XXXXX—————
ConnecticutXXXXXXXX—XX——
Delaware————————————X
District of Columbia—X——XXX——X———
Florida†††††††††††††
              
GeorgiaXXXXXXX———X——
HawaiiXXXXXXXX——X——
IdahoXX——XX————X——
Illinois——XXXXXX——X——
IndianaXXX—XXXX——X——
              
Iowa—X———X—X—————
Kansas—————X—X—————
KentuckyXXX——————————
LouisianaXX——XXX———X——
Maine—XX—XXXX——X——
              
Maryland————————————X
MassachusettsXXXXXXXX——X——
Michigan1X / —X / X— / —— / XX / XX / XX / XX / X— / —— / —X / XX / X— / —
MinnesotaXX——XXX———X——
MississippiXXXXXX————X——
              
MissouriXX—X—XXX—XX——
Montana—X—X—X————X——
NebraskaXXX—XXXXXXX——
NevadaXXX—XX—X——X——
New HampshireXXX—XXXX——X——
              
New JerseyXXXXXX—XX—X——
New Mexico—XXXXXXX—XX——
New YorkXX———XXX—————
North CarolinaXXX—XXXX—————
North Dakota—XX—XXXX—XXX—
              
OhioXXX—XXXX——X——
OklahomaXXXXXXXXXXX——
OregonXXXX—————————
Pennsylvania———XXX—X—X———
Rhode IslandXX—X—XX——XX——
              
South CarolinaXXXX—XXX—XX——
South DakotaXXX—XXXX——X——
TennesseeXXXXXXXX——X——
TexasXXXXXXXXXXX——
UtahXX———X————X——
              
Vermont———X—XX——XXX—
VirginiaXX—X—XXX—————
WashingtonXX—XXXXX—XX——
West VirginiaXX——XX—X—XXX—
Wisconsin———X————————X
WyomingXXXXXXXXXX——
— No.
X Yes.
† Not applicable. State did not have alternate achievement standards for this assessment.
1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07.
IES    
NCSER
National Center for
Special Education
Research
Explore the Institute of Education Sciences