Skip Navigation
National Profile on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards:

NCSER 2009-3014
August 2009

Table C5.  Did the state document the validity of the alternate assessment in terms of scoring and reporting structures consistent with the subdomain structures of its content standards?


State 1. Yes, with evidence provided
to the research team (Scoring
and reporting documents)
2. Yes, but evidence was not
provided to the research team (Not
available for examination)
3. No
Total 18 3 29
Percent 35.29 5.88 56.86
       
Alabama X
Alaska X
Arizona X
Arkansas X
California X
       
Colorado X
Connecticut X
Delaware X
District of Columbia X
Florida
       
Georgia X
Hawaii X
Idaho X
Illinois X
Indiana X
       
Iowa X
Kansas X
Kentucky X
Louisiana X
Maine X
       
Maryland X
Massachusetts X
Michigan1 X / X — / — — / —
Minnesota X
Mississippi X
       
Missouri X
Montana X
Nebraska X
Nevada X
New Hampshire X
       
New Jersey X
New Mexico X
New York X
North Carolina X
North Dakota X
       
Ohio X
Oklahoma X
Oregon X
Pennsylvania X
Rhode Island X
       
South Carolina X
South Dakota X
Tennessee X
Texas X
Utah X
       
Vermont X
Virginia X
Washington X
West Virginia X
Wisconsin X
Wyoming X
— No.
X Yes.
† Not applicable. State did not have alternate achievement standards for this assessment.
1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07.