Table C7. What evidence supported the validity argument in terms of test and item scores related to internal or external variables as intended?

National Profile on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards:A Report From the National Study on Alternate Assessments

NCSER 2009-3014
August 2009

Appendix B: Data Tables

State	1. Correlational study	a. Internal item-to-item analysis	b. Correlational analysis using external measures	2. Other type of analysis
Total	18	7	5	7
Percent	85.71	33.33	23.81	33.33

Alabama	†	†	†	†
Alaska	†	†	†	†
Arizona	X	—	X	—
Arkansas	†	†	†	†
California	X	—	—	—

Colorado	X	X	—	—
Connecticut	†	†	†	†
Delaware	†	†	†	†
District of Columbia	X	X	—	—
Florida	†	†	†	†

Georgia	†	†	†	†
Hawaii	X	—	X	—
Idaho	X	—	X	X
Illinois	†	†	†	†
Indiana	†	†	†	†

Iowa	†	†	†	†
Kansas	†	†	†	†
Kentucky	†	†	†	†
Louisiana	—	—	—	X
Maine	†	†	†	†

Maryland	†	†	†	†
Massachusetts	—	—	—	X
Michigan¹	X / X	X / X	— / —	— / —
Minnesota	X	—	—	—
Mississippi	X	—	X	—

Missouri	†	†	†	†
Montana	X	X	—	—
Nebraska	†	†	†	†
Nevada	†	†	†	†
New Hampshire	†	†	†	†

New Jersey	X	X	—	—
New Mexico	X	X	—	—
New York	†	†	†	†
North Carolina	†	†	†	†
North Dakota	†	†	†	†

Ohio	X	—	—	—
Oklahoma	†	†	†	†
Oregon	†	†	†	†
Pennsylvania	†	†	†	†
Rhode Island	†	†	†	†

South Carolina	X	X	—	—
South Dakota	†	†	†	†
Tennessee	†	†	†	†
Texas	†	†	†	†
Utah	†	†	†	†

Vermont	—	—	—	X
Virginia	†	†	†	†
Washington	X	—	—	X
West Virginia	X	—	—	X
Wisconsin	X	—	X	X
Wyoming	X	—	—	—
— No. X Yes. † Not applicable. State did not have alternate achievement standards for this assessment. ¹ More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07.