Table C9. What evidence supported the validity of the alternate assessment in terms of purposes of the assessment, delineating the types of uses and decisions most appropriate and the assessment results consistent with the purposes?
State | 1. Survey | 2. Alignment study | 3. Field tests/ pilot tests |
4. Construct validity analysis |
5. Analytic review of outcomes |
6. State monitoring/ program review |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 8 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 2 |
Percent | 47.06 | 29.41 | 5.88 | 41.18 | 17.65 | 11.76 |
Alabama | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Alaska | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Arizona | — | X | — | — | — | — |
Arkansas | † | † | † | † | † | † |
California | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Colorado | X | — | — | — | — | — |
Connecticut | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Delaware | † | † | † | † | † | † |
District of Columbia | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Florida | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Georgia | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Hawaii | X | — | — | — | — | — |
Idaho | X | X | — | — | X | — |
Illinois | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Indiana | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Iowa | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Kansas | — | — | — | X | — | — |
Kentucky | † | † | † | † | † | — |
Louisiana | — | — | — | X | X | — |
Maine | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Maryland | X | — | — | — | — | — |
Massachusetts | X | — | X | X | X | X |
Michigan1 | † / † | † / † | † / † | † / † | † / † | † / † |
Minnesota | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Mississippi | — | X | — | X | — | — |
Missouri | — | — | — | X | — | — |
Montana | — | — | — | X | — | — |
Nebraska | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Nevada | X | — | — | — | — | — |
New Hampshire | † | † | † | † | † | † |
New Jersey | † | † | † | † | † | † |
New Mexico | — | — | — | — | — | X |
New York | X | — | — | — | — | — |
North Carolina | † | † | † | † | † | † |
North Dakota | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Ohio | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Oklahoma | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Oregon | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Pennsylvania | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Rhode Island | † | † | † | † | † | † |
South Carolina | — | X | — | X | — | — |
South Dakota | — | X | — | — | — | — |
Tennessee | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Texas | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Utah | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Vermont | X | — | — | — | — | — |
Virginia | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Washington | † | † | † | † | † | † |
West Virginia | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Wisconsin | † | † | † | † | † | † |
Wyoming | † | † | † | † | † | † |
— No.
X Yes. † Not applicable. State did not have alternate achievement standards for this assessment. 1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07. |