Skip Navigation
National Profile on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards:

NCSER 2009-3014
August 2009

Table D1.  What were the guidelines for IEP teams to apply in determining when a child's significant cognitive disability justified alternate assessment?


State 1. Had a severe
cognitive disability
2. Required modified
instruction
3. Required extensive support
for skill generalization
4. Required modified
curriculum
5. Not based on
disability category
Total4747444633
Percent92.1692.1686.2790.264.71
      
AlabamaXXXXX
AlaskaXXXX
ArizonaXXX
ArkansasXXXX
CaliforniaXXXXX
      
ColoradoXXX
ConnecticutXXXX
DelawareXXXXX
District of ColumbiaXXXXX
FloridaXXXXX
      
GeorgiaXXXX
HawaiiXXXX
IdahoXXXXX
IllinoisXXXXX
IndianaXXXXX
      
IowaXXX
KansasXXXXX
KentuckyXXXX
LouisianaXXXX
MaineXXX
      
MarylandXXXXX
MassachusettsXXXX
Michigan1X / XX / X— / XX / XX / X
MinnesotaXXXXX
MississippiXXXXX
      
MissouriXXXXX
MontanaXXXX
NebraskaXXXXX
NevadaXXXX
New HampshireXXXXX
      
New JerseyXXXXX
New MexicoXXXX
New YorkXXX
North CarolinaXXXXX
North DakotaXXXXX
      
OhioX
OklahomaXXXXX
OregonXXXXX
PennsylvaniaXXXX
Rhode IslandXXXXX
      
South CarolinaXXXX
South DakotaXXXXX
TennesseeXXXXX
TexasXXXX
UtahXXXX
      
VermontXXXX
VirginiaXXXX
WashingtonXXX
West VirginiaXX
WisconsinXXXX
WyomingXXXX
— No.
X Yes.
1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07.