Skip Navigation
National Profile on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards:

NCSER 2009-3014
August 2009

Table D3.  How was assessment content selected?


State 1. All components — State
determined academic
content areas and strands,
standards, benchmarks, and
performance indicators/tasks
2. Most components — State
determined academic
content areas, strands, and
standards, and the IEP team
determined performance
indicators/tasks
3. Some components — State
determined only the
academic content areas
Total24207
Percent47.0639.2213.73
    
AlabamaX
AlaskaX
ArizonaX
ArkansasX
CaliforniaX
    
ColoradoX
ConnecticutX
DelawareX
District of ColumbiaX
FloridaX
    
GeorgiaX
HawaiiX
IdahoX
IllinoisX
IndianaX
    
IowaX
KansasX
KentuckyX
LouisianaX
MaineX
    
MarylandX
MassachusettsX
Michigan1X / X— / —— / —
MinnesotaX
MississippiX
    
MissouriX
MontanaX
NebraskaX
NevadaX
New HampshireX
    
New JerseyX
New MexicoX
New YorkX
North CarolinaX
North DakotaX
    
OhioX
OklahomaX
OregonX
PennsylvaniaX
Rhode IslandX
    
South CarolinaX
South DakotaX
TennesseeX
TexasX
UtahX
    
VermontX
VirginiaX
WashingtonX
West VirginiaX
WisconsinX
WyomingX
— No.
X Yes.
1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07.