Table E5. What types of training were provided for assessment administrators?
State | 1. Non-face-to-face training | 2. Face-to-face training | 3. Training was mandatory and/or certification was required |
---|---|---|---|
Total | 49 | 48 | 27 |
Percent | 96.08 | 94.12 | 52.94 |
Alabama | — | X | X |
Alaska | X | X | X |
Arizona | X | X | — |
Arkansas | X | X | — |
California | X | X | X |
Colorado | X | X | X |
Connecticut | X | X | X |
Delaware | X | X | X |
District of Columbia | X | X | X |
Florida | — | X | X |
Georgia | X | X | X |
Hawaii | X | X | X |
Idaho | X | X | — |
Illinois | X | X | — |
Indiana | X | X | — |
Iowa | X | — | — |
Kansas | X | X | X |
Kentucky | X | X | X |
Louisiana | X | X | X |
Maine | X | X | — |
Maryland | X | X | X |
Massachusetts | X | X | — |
Michigan1 | X / X | X / X | X / X |
Minnesota | X | X | X |
Mississippi | X | X | X |
Missouri | X | X | — |
Montana | X | X | X |
Nebraska | X | X | — |
Nevada | X | X | — |
New Hampshire | X | X | — |
New Jersey | X | X | — |
New Mexico | X | X | X |
New York | X | X | — |
North Carolina | X | X | X |
North Dakota | X | — | — |
Ohio | X | X | — |
Oklahoma | X | X | — |
Oregon | X | X | X |
Pennsylvania | X | X | — |
Rhode Island | X | X | — |
South Carolina | X | X | X |
South Dakota | X | X | X |
Tennessee | X | X | — |
Texas | X | X | — |
Utah | X | — | X |
Vermont | X | X | X |
Virginia | X | X | — |
Washington | X | X | — |
West Virginia | X | X | X |
Wisconsin | X | X | — |
Wyoming | X | X | X |
— No.
X Yes. 1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07. |