Skip Navigation
National Profile on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards:

NCSER 2009-3014
August 2009

Table E5.  What types of training were provided for assessment administrators?


State1. Non-face-to-face
training
2. Face-to-face training3. Training was
mandatory and/or
certification was
required
Total494827
Percent96.0894.1252.94
    
AlabamaXX
AlaskaXXX
ArizonaXX
ArkansasXX
CaliforniaXXX
    
ColoradoXXX
ConnecticutXXX
DelawareXXX
District of ColumbiaXXX
FloridaXX
    
GeorgiaXXX
HawaiiXXX
IdahoXX
IllinoisXX
IndianaXX
    
IowaX
KansasXXX
KentuckyXXX
LouisianaXXX
MaineXX
    
MarylandXXX
MassachusettsXX
Michigan1X / XX / XX / X
MinnesotaXXX
MississippiXXX
    
MissouriXX
MontanaXXX
NebraskaXX
NevadaXX
New HampshireXX
    
New JerseyXX
New MexicoXXX
New YorkXX
North CarolinaXXX
North DakotaX
    
OhioXX
OklahomaXX
OregonXXX
PennsylvaniaXX
Rhode IslandXX
    
South CarolinaXXX
South DakotaXXX
TennesseeXX
TexasXX
UtahXX
    
VermontXXX
VirginiaXX
WashingtonXX
West VirginiaXXX
WisconsinXX
WyomingXXX
— No.
X Yes.
1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07.