Skip Navigation
National Profile on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards:

NCSER 2009-3014
August 2009

Table E6.  What types of training were provided for assessment scorers?


State1. Non-face-to-face
training
2. Face-to-face training3. Training was
mandatory and/or
certification was
required
Total384537
Percent74.4588.2472.55
    
AlabamaXX
AlaskaXXX
ArizonaXX
ArkansasXX
CaliforniaXX
    
Colorado
ConnecticutXXX
DelawareXXX
District of ColumbiaXXX
FloridaXX
    
GeorgiaXX
HawaiiXXX
IdahoXX
IllinoisXXX
IndianaXX
    
IowaXXX
KansasXXX
KentuckyXXX
LouisianaX
MaineXXX
    
MarylandXXX
MassachusettsXX
Michigan1† / X† / —† / —
MinnesotaX
MississippiXXX
    
MissouriXXX
MontanaXXX
NebraskaXX
NevadaXX
New HampshireXXX
    
New JerseyXX
New MexicoXXX
New YorkXX
North CarolinaXXX
North DakotaX
    
OhioXX
OklahomaXXX
OregonXXX
PennsylvaniaX
Rhode IslandXXX
    
South CarolinaXXX
South DakotaXXX
TennesseeXX
TexasXX
UtahXXX
    
VermontXX
VirginiaXX
WashingtonXX
West VirginiaXXX
WisconsinXX
WyomingXXX
— No.
X Yes.
1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07.