Skip Navigation
National Profile on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards:

NCSER 2009-3014
August 2009

Table A9.  Alternate assessment developer


State 1. Assessment
company
2. Research
company/university
independent
researcher
3. Technical
assistance provider
4. State personnel 5. Parents 6. Stakeholders
Total 25 34 17 49 25 40
Percent 49.02 66.67 33.33 96.08 49.02 78.43
 
Alabama X X X X
Alaska X X X X X X
Arizona X X X X
Arkansas X X
California X X X X X
 
Colorado X X X X
Connecticut X X X X
Delaware X X X X X
District of Columbia X X X
Florida X X
 
Georgia X X X X X
Hawaii X X X X X
Idaho X X X X
Illinois X
Indiana X X X X X
 
Iowa X X
Kansas X X X X
Kentucky X X X X
Louisiana X X X
Maine X X
 
Maryland X X X X X X
Massachusetts X X X X
Michigan1 X / — — / — — / — X / X X / X X / X
Minnesota X X X
Mississippi X X X
 
Missouri X X X X X
Montana X X
Nebraska X X X X X
Nevada X X X X X
New Hampshire X X X X X
 
New Jersey X X X X
New Mexico X X X X
New York X X X
North Carolina X X X
North Dakota X X X X X
 
Ohio X X X
Oklahoma X X
Oregon X X
Pennsylvania X
Rhode Island X X X X X
 
South Carolina X X X
South Dakota X X
Tennessee X X X X
Texas X X X X
Utah X X X X X
 
Vermont X X
Virginia X X X X X X
Washington X X X X
West Virginia X X X X X
Wisconsin X X X
Wyoming X X X X
— No.
X Yes.
1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix.
NOTE: Percentages do not sum to 100 because multiple responses were possible.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006-07.