Skip Navigation
National Profile on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards:

NCSER 2009-3014
August 2009

Table C10.  Did the state document the validity of the alternate assessment in terms of the assessment system's producing intended and/or unintended consequences?


State 1. Yes, formal
study conducted
2. Yes, but evidence was not
provided to the research team
(Not available for examination)
3. Yes, but no formal study
was conducted (Anecdotal
or committee process)
4. No
Total228218
Percent43.1415.693.9235.29
     
AlabamaX
AlaskaX
ArizonaX
ArkansasX
CaliforniaX
     
ColoradoX
ConnecticutX
DelawareX
District of ColumbiaX
Florida
     
GeorgiaX
HawaiiX
IdahoX
IllinoisX
IndianaX
     
IowaX
KansasX
KentuckyX
LouisianaX
MaineX
     
MarylandX
MassachusettsX
Michigan1— / —— / —— / —X / X
MinnesotaX
MississippiX
     
MissouriX
MontanaX
NebraskaX
NevadaX
New HampshireX
     
New JerseyX
New MexicoX
New YorkX
North CarolinaX
North DakotaX
     
OhioX
OklahomaX
OregonX
PennsylvaniaX
Rhode IslandX
     
South CarolinaX
South DakotaX
TennesseeX
TexasX
UtahX
     
VermontX
VirginiaX
WashingtonX
West VirginiaX
WisconsinX
WyomingX
— No.
X Yes.
† Not applicable. State did not have alternate achievement standards for this assessment.
1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07.