Table C18. What evidence supported the reliability argument in terms of variability across groups?
State | 1. NCLB group statistical analyses conducted | 2. Review of disability group results |
---|---|---|
Total | 14 | 4 |
Percent | 93.33 | 26.67 |
Alabama | † | † |
Alaska | X | — |
Arizona | X | — |
Arkansas | † | † |
California | X | X |
Colorado | † | † |
Connecticut | X | — |
Delaware | † | † |
District of Columbia | † | † |
Florida | † | † |
Georgia | † | † |
Hawaii | † | † |
Idaho | X | X |
Illinois | † | † |
Indiana | † | † |
Iowa | † | † |
Kansas | † | † |
Kentucky | † | † |
Louisiana | — | X |
Maine | † | † |
Maryland | † | † |
Massachusetts | † | † |
Michigan1 | X / X | — / — |
Minnesota | † | † |
Mississippi | X | — |
Missouri | † | † |
Montana | † | † |
Nebraska | † | † |
Nevada | † | † |
New Hampshire | X | — |
New Jersey | † | † |
New Mexico | X | — |
New York | † | † |
North Carolina | † | † |
North Dakota | X | — |
Ohio | X | — |
Oklahoma | † | † |
Oregon | † | † |
Pennsylvania | † | † |
Rhode Island | † | † |
South Carolina | X | X |
South Dakota | † | † |
Tennessee | † | † |
Texas | † | † |
Utah | X | — |
Vermont | † | † |
Virginia | † | † |
Washington | † | † |
West Virginia | X | — |
Wisconsin | † | † |
Wyoming | † | † |
— No. X Yes. † Not applicable. State did not have alternate achievement standards for this assessment. 1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07. |