Table C21. What evidence supported the reliability argument in terms of interrater consistency in scoring?
State | 1. Statistical analysis conducted as part of training |
2. Statistical analysis conducted as part of actual scoring |
---|---|---|
Total | 10 | 34 |
Percent | 25.64 | 89.47 |
Alabama | † | † |
Alaska | † | † |
Arizona | † | † |
Arkansas | † | † |
California | — | X |
Colorado | — | X |
Connecticut | X | — |
Delaware | X | — |
District of Columbia | X | — |
Florida | † | † |
Georgia | — | X |
Hawaii | — | X |
Idaho | — | X |
Illinois | — | X |
Indiana | — | X |
Iowa | X | X |
Kansas | — | X |
Kentucky | — | X |
Louisiana | — | X |
Maine | — | X |
Maryland | X | X |
Massachusetts | X | X |
Michigan1 | †/— | †/X |
Minnesota | — | X |
Mississippi | — | X |
Missouri | — | X |
Montana | † | † |
Nebraska | X | — |
Nevada | — | X |
New Hampshire | — | X |
New Jersey | † | † |
New Mexico | — | X |
New York | X | X |
North Carolina | † | † |
North Dakota | † | † |
Ohio | — | X |
Oklahoma | † | † |
Oregon | † | † |
Pennsylvania | X | X |
Rhode Island | — | X |
South Carolina | — | X |
South Dakota | † | † |
Tennessee | — | X |
Texas | † | † |
Utah | — | X |
Vermont | X | X |
Virginia | — | X |
Washington | — | X |
West Virginia | — | X |
Wisconsin | — | X |
Wyoming | — | X |
— No. X Yes. † Not applicable. State did not have alternate achievement standards for this assessment. 1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07. |