Skip Navigation
National Profile on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards:

NCSER 2009-3014
August 2009

Table C6.  Did the state document the validity of the alternate assessment in terms of test and item scores related to internal or external variables as intended?


State 1. Yes, formal
study conducted
2. Yes, but evidence was
not provided to the
research team (Not
available for examination)
3. Yes, but no formal
study was conducted
(Committee process
or internal review)
4. No
Total 21 4 1 24
Percent 41.18 7.84 1.96 47.06
         
Alabama X
Alaska X
Arizona X
Arkansas X
California X
         
Colorado X
Connecticut X
Delaware X
District of Columbia X
Florida
         
Georgia X
Hawaii X
Idaho X
Illinois X
Indiana X
         
Iowa X
Kansas X
Kentucky X
Louisiana X
Maine X
         
Maryland X
Massachusetts X
Michigan1 X / X — / — — / — — / —
Minnesota X
Mississippi X
Missouri X
Montana X
Nebraska X
Nevada X
New Hampshire X
         
New Jersey X
New Mexico X
New York X
North Carolina X
North Dakota X
         
Ohio X
Oklahoma X
Oregon X
Pennsylvania X
Rhode Island X
         
South Carolina X
South Dakota X
Tennessee X
Texas X
Utah X
         
Vermont X
Virginia X
Washington X
West Virginia X
Wisconsin X
Wyoming X
— No.
X Yes.
† Not applicable. State did not have alternate achievement standards for this assessment.
1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07.