Skip Navigation
National Profile on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards:

NCSER 2009-3014
August 2009

Table E4.  What environmental elements were used in scoring?


State1. Instruction in multiple
settings
2. Opportunities to plan,
monitor, and evaluate
work
3. Work with
nondisabled peers
4. Appropriate human
and technological
supports
5. None of the above
Total14791729
Percent27.4513.7317.6533.3356.86
      
AlabamaX
AlaskaX
ArizonaX
ArkansasX
CaliforniaX
      
ColoradoX
ConnecticutX
DelawareXXXX
District of ColumbiaX
FloridaX
      
GeorgiaXX
HawaiiX
IdahoXX
IllinoisX
IndianaX
      
IowaX
KansasX
KentuckyX
LouisianaX
MaineX
      
MarylandX
MassachusettsX
Michigan1— / —— / —— / —X / —— / X
MinnesotaX
MississippiX
      
MissouriX
MontanaX
NebraskaX
NevadaX
New HampshireXXXX
      
New JerseyX
New MexicoX
New YorkX
North CarolinaX
North DakotaXXXX
      
OhioXX
OklahomaXXXX
OregonX
PennsylvaniaX
Rhode IslandX
      
South CarolinaX
South DakotaXX
TennesseeXXXX
TexasX
UtahXXX
      
VermontXX
VirginiaX
WashingtonX
West VirginiaX
WisconsinXXX
WyomingX
— No.
X Yes.
1 More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07.