Table C16. How did the extended content standards map to the state content standards?

Appendix B: Data Tables

State	1. General link to state content standards	2. Grade or grade	3. Expanded benchmarks	4. Alternate indicators or tasks
Total	37	34	33	22
Percent	82.22	75.56	73.33	48.89

Alabama	X	X	X	—
Alaska	X	X	X	—
Arizona	X	X	X	—
Arkansas	X	X	X	X
California	X	—	—	—

Colorado	X	—	X	X
Connecticut	—	—	X	—
Delaware	X	X	—	X
District of Columbia	X	X	X	X
Florida	†	†	†	†

Georgia	†	†	†	†
Hawaii	X	X	X	X
Idaho	—	X	X	—
Illinois	—	—	—	X
Indiana	X	X	X	X

Iowa	†	†	†	†
Kansas	X	X	X	X
Kentucky	—	X	X	—
Louisiana	X	—	—	—
Maine	X	X	—	X

Maryland	†	†	†	†
Massachusetts	X	X	X	X
Michigan¹	X / X	X / X	X / X	X / X
Minnesota	X	X	X	—
Mississippi	X	—	—	—

Missouri	—	—	X	X
Montana	—	X	X	—
Nebraska	X	—	—	—
Nevada	X	X	X	X
New Hampshire	X	—	—	—

New Jersey	†	†	†	†
New Mexico	X	X	X	—
New York	X	X	X	X
North Carolina	X	X	—	—
North Dakota	†	†	†	†

Ohio	—	X	X	X
Oklahoma	X	X	X	—
Oregon	X	X	X	X
Pennsylvania	X	X	X	X
Rhode Island	X	X	X	X

South Carolina	X	X	X	—
South Dakota	X	X	X	X
Tennessee	X	X	X	X
Texas	X	X	X	—
Utah	X	—	—	—

Vermont	—	X	X	—
Virginia	X	—	—	—
Washington	X	X	—	—
West Virginia	X	X	X	X
Wisconsin	X	X	X	—
Wyoming	X	X	X	X
— No. X Yes. † Not applicable. State did not have alternate achievement standards for this assessment. ¹ More than one assessment used. See explanation in introductory text of this appendix. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, National Study on Alternate Assessments (NSAA), state data summaries for school year 2006–07.